| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Project Wildfire
322
   |
Posted - 2012.06.15 14:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:
highsec miner - entitled, bleating that he deserves to mine in perfect safety in highsec.
I've yet to see any miner make that statement. I've see them say a destroyer shouldn't be able to gank a hulk before concord can kill it but that's completely different.
But anyway, thanks for all the hard, selfless work you do to improve the game for us all Goonswarm... I wish we had more guys like you instead of some of the other in your face circle jerking alliances out there. 
|
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Project Wildfire
323
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 15:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
InternetSpaceship wrote:
No one overtly says it, but the constant begging to make highsec perfectly safe certainly makes it clean that that is what they expect. It is possible to derive the true meaning from someone's behavior without them explicitly telling you what it is that they really want.
Yeah and it's also possible to misunderstand someones meaning or twist their words to suit your needs.
Again nobody is asking CCP to make highsec perfectly safe but the fact is - the punishment does not fit the crime and with you paying people to gank, the ganker have become the ones indulging in risk free gameplay.
You can train a character capable of ganking a poorly tanked hulk in a short time and then throw that character away once your done with it. You could also invest a little more into a character by getting him into a tornado > gank a few hulks > get banned from HS > grind your standing back up and get paid by concord for your trouble > rinse and repeat. Where is the risk there?
|
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Project Wildfire
323
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 16:28:00 -
[3] - Quote
InternetSpaceship wrote:
You see, you're mistaken here. There are quite a few people on these very forums who are specifically asking for just that.
Further, if we have the resources and influence to pay gankers, then thanks to the sandbox, we're allowed to do that. If miners don't like it, they need to make a low or nullsec alliance and work together for protection and profit. Begging for CCP to swoop in and alter the game to fit their play style isn't playing the game at all.
I think those people are in the minority though. Most eve players know that ganking is a necisary part of the game and good for the economy.
I just feel a little sorry for the guy with one account trying to make a living in eve and while the bigest alliance in the game seeks to vilafy him in the eyes of the community. He already has the sole destroyingly boring mining mechanic to deal with 
And i agree, if you guys have the resources to fund an activity like hulkagedon, they you are well within your right to do so. I just wish you didn't claim you do these things for the good of the game when in actuality, it's just for your personal enjoyment/gain. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Project Wildfire
323
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 16:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
No More Heroes wrote:
Doesn't everyone do things ingame that they personally enjoy? And also generates gain? Why the hell else play a game but for enjoyment. The 'good of the game' comes in as: dread pirate types have something to do and also makes isk, newbee gonns have something to do, vets have something to do, and miners learn to protect themselves or nerdrage and quit.
Also- THE ECONOMY
Of course they do but not everyone claims that their selfish acts are for the good of the community. |
| |
|